Draft a Show HN post in the format HN actually respects

Why most Show HN posts flop

• Marketing adjectives get flagged on sight. “Beautiful,” “revolutionary,” “AI-powered” — the community reads these as a founder who doesn't know the format.
• The body should be a first-person narrative. “I built X because Y. Here's how it works. Here's what's still rough.” Not a feature list.
• The first comment matters more than the post. Live in the thread for 48 hours. Answer the “why not just use Z” questions with substance.

Questions

What does this tool do?

It drafts a Show HN post in the HN community format: plain noun-form title, first-person body, the sections the community expects (what it is, why you built it, technical detail, what's unfinished).

Is this tool really free?

Yes. No login, no account. The model is the same one we use for the full OpenCorp research flow.

How do I make a Show HN that doesn't flop?

Plain noun title, no marketing adjectives, first comment with what you actually built and what's still rough, reply in-thread for 48 hours. The drafter follows that format. The rest is the substance of your tool.

Why not just write the post yourself?

You should. Use the drafter as a starting point, then rewrite every section in your own voice. The point of the tool is to surface the format, not the words.